|
Example #4: The
1974 Bear Market Low
The final decline into 1974,
ending the 1966-1974 Cycle degree wave IV correction of the
entire wave III rise from 1942, brought the averages down to the
area of the previous fourth wave of lesser degree (Primary wave[
4]). Again, Figure 5-3 shows what happened.
Our analysis of small degree wave
sequences over the last twenty years further validates the
proposition that the usual limitation of any bear market is the
travel area of the preceding fourth wave of one lesser degree,
particularly when the bear market in question is itself a fourth
wave. However, in a clearly reasonable modification of the
guideline, it is often the case that if the first wave in
a sequence extends, the correction following the fifth wave will
have as a typical limit the bottom of the second wave of
lesser degree. For example, the decline into March 1978 in the
DJIA bottomed exactly at the low of the second wave in March
1975, which followed an extended first wave off the December
1974 low.
On occasion, flat corrections or
triangles, particularly those following extensions (see Example
#3), will barely fail to reach into the fourth wave area.
Zigzags, on occasion, will cut deeply and move down into the
area of the second wave of lesser degree, although this almost
exclusively occurs when the zigzags are themselves second waves.
"Double bottoms" are sometimes formed in this manner.
Behavior Following Fifth Wave
Extensions
The most important empirically
derived rule that can be distilled from our observations of
market behavior is that when the fifth wave of an advance is an
extension, the ensuing correction will be sharp and find support
at the level of the low of wave two of the extension. Sometimes
the correction will end there, as illustrated in Figure 2-6.
Although a limited number of real life examples exist, the
precision with which "A" waves have reversed at the
level of the low of wave two of the preceding fifth wave
extension is remarkable. Figure 2-7 is an illustration involving
an expanded flat correction. (For future reference, please make
a note of two real-life examples that we will show in charts of
upcoming lessons. An example involving a zigzag can be found in
Figure 5-3 at the low of wave [a] of II, and an example
involving an expanded flat can be found in Figure 2-16 at the
low of wave a of A of 4. As you will see in Figure 5-3, wave A
of (IV) bottoms near wave (2) of [5], which is an extension
within wave V from 1921 to 1929.)
Since the low of the second wave
of an extension is commonly in or near the price territory of
the immediately preceding fourth wave of one larger degree, this
guideline implies behavior similar to that for the preceding
guideline. It is notable for its precision, however.
Additional value is provided by the fact that fifth wave
extensions are typically followed by swift retracements.
Their occurrence, then, is an advance warning of a dramatic
reversal to a specific level, a powerful combination of
knowledge. This guideline does not apply separately to fifth
wave extensions of fifth wave extensions.

|