Elliott Wave International | World's Largest Market Forecasting Firm Since 1979
Please Login
 
 | What's My Password?
EWI

Home > Economy
The Fed's "Influence" is "Nonexistent"
Is Anyone REALLY Surprised

By Robert Folsom
Wed, 12 Mar 2008 17:15:00 ET
Email |  Print  |  RSS Feeds Generated by Elliott Wave International RSS |  My Updates
Bookmark and share It!

Afternoon selling left Wednesday's stock market slightly lower (Mar. 12).

*****

Amidst all the happy words and noises that followed yesterday's story that "Fed Offers $200 Billion Lifeline for Spurned Debt," most news accounts either failed to include or buried the truly relevant details:

"As collateral, the Fed will accept debt or mortgage-backed securities issued or guaranteed by Fannie and Freddie, also known as "agency" securities. It will also accept other residential-mortgage-backed securities, provided they are rated triple-A and not on watch for downgrade....

"The Fed is requiring the collateral to exceed the amount of the loan to protect against losses, so dealers could be surrendering more than $200 billion of mortgage-backed securities to the central bank. That figure still equals less than 5% of all agency mortgage-backed securities."

Looked at closely, the Fed's "Offer" of a "Lifeline" comes attached with the kind of terms you'd expect from a benevolent loan shark. Banks can "borrow" Treasury securities from the Fed, but those Treasuries must be "repaid" in 28 days. And, the "borrowing" must be more than fully collateralized -- meaning, the Fed won't even recognize the face value of AAA-rated mortgage backed securities. Banks must put up more than $200 billion in collateral, in case that collateral loses value in the next 28 days.

These terms make the whole thing a bad joke. What's more, the butt of this particular bad joke is anyone who believes the Fed has delivered "a shot in the arm to stressed financial markets."

As columnist Floyd Norris points out, yesterday was the ninth time since August 16 that the Fed has "done something." The S&P 500 is up a net 81 points on those days, but down a net 173 points on the other days (and 6.5% lower overall since August 16).

The story is even worse for the S&P Financials index -- slightly net higher on Fed "announcement" days, far more net lower other days, down 24% overall since August 16.

None of this is a surprise. I would say that the Fed's influence is quantifiable, except that the quantification process itself shows the Fed's influence is nonexistent; the only real surprise is that anyone still imagines it exists at all.

Tags: $200 billion, AAA rating, AAA ratings, banking, Fed, Federal Reserve, subprime mortgages, Treasuries

Rating: - based on [97 rating(s)]
Rate this content:
  

People who read this also read:
It's Not Science Fiction, Isaac, it's Socionomics
Oil's Recent Selloff Defies One Kind of Logic (CHART)
Cross-Straits Negotiations and the TAIEX: What's Next for Taiwan?
Hyperinflation Worries Laid to Rest, Part II
Cocoa: Has the Commodity Star Lost Its Luster?
Categories
Most Recent Articles
- 11/20/2009 5:15:00 PM
S&P: Much Ado About... 5.5 Percent
- 11/20/2009 4:30:00 PM
Commodities Feast of Opportunities: Dig In
- 11/20/2009 3:45:00 PM
Bonds: How Will They Do in a Deflation?
- 11/20/2009 2:15:00 PM
Why Your FDIC-Backed Bank Could Fail
- 11/19/2009 5:15:00 PM
Gold and the Dow: The exceptions, or the rule?

Announcing EWI's New eBook ...

EWI's New Trading eBook: How to Trade the Highest Probability Opportunities: Price Bars and Chart PatternsIn this exciting new 45-page eBook, Jeffrey Kennedy shows you – using fresh, real-life market examples – how you can use simple, yet powerful, chart reading techniques to improve your trading.

Download your copy today!



To access EWI's valuable Q&A message board, all you need is a free Club EWI profile. Create Yours Now >>
> Wars: Do they affect the stock market's Elliott wave patterns? 
> Market manipulation: Can wave patterns detect it?  
> Warren Bufett: Doesn't his latest major purchase boost market mood? 
> George Soros' Reflexivity Theory: Similar to Prechter's socionomics? 
> College tuition: Will it cost more or less in a deflation? 
> Currencies: How do I count Elliott waves between cash and futures? 
> Weekends and trading halts: How do they factor into Elliott wave count? 
> Crisis Part II: Who will people blame if stocks crash again? 
> Socionomics and 'The Wisdom of Crowds': Any connection? 
> Do you know of any mutual funds that use Elliott wave analysis? 

Club EWI Members: Click Here

 
Press Room
IN THE MEDIA
Browse Recent Media Articles that Mention EWI or Feature EWI Analysts

As the markets enter what Bob Prechter calls "the point of recognition," we notice that mainstream media pundits who get it start to notice us, our analysts and our forecasts. You can browse dozens of recent media articles about EWI in the EWI Press Room.
 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Elliott Wave Principle is a detailed description of how financial markets behave. The description reveals that mass psychology swings from pessimism to optimism and back in a natural sequence, creating specific Elliott wave patterns in price movements. Each pattern has implications regarding the position of the market within its overall progression, past, present and future. The purpose of Elliott Wave International’s market-oriented publications is to outline the progress of markets in terms of the Wave Principle and to educate interested parties in the successful application of the Wave Principle. While a course of conduct regarding investments can be formulated from such application of the Wave Principle, at no time will Elliott Wave International make specific recommendations for any specific person, and at no time may a reader, caller or viewer be justified in inferring that any such advice is intended. Investing carries risk of losses, and trading futures or options is especially risky because these instruments are highly leveraged, and traders can lose more than their initial margin funds. Information provided by Elliott Wave International is expressed in good faith, but it is not guaranteed. The market service that never makes mistakes does not exist. Long-term success trading or investing in the markets demands recognition of the fact that error and uncertainty are part of any effort to assess future probabilities. Please ask your broker or your advisor to explain all risks to you before making any trading and investing decisions.