Elliott Wave International | World's Largest Market Forecasting Firm Since 1979
Please Login
   
| What's My Password?
 
EWI FIND US:
Like Us FacebookFollow us on Twitter

Deflation gold relationship

The deflation gold relationship is one that sparks heated debate, especially among gold bugs.

On March 14, 2008, financial analyst Robert Prechter called for a top in gold and silver prices. The next trading day, March 17, silver topped. Soon after, gold began a precipitous decline.

In that March 2008 Elliott Wave Theorist, Prechter discussed in detail the deflation gold relationship.

Many gold bugs say that because gold was a good investment during the Great Depression, it is a "deflation hedge." Prechter addresses this topic in Conquer the Crash (chapter 22). At the time, government fixed gold's price, so it didn't go up or down relative to dollars. Gold was a haven then because its price was equal to the dollar by law. Gold's price was fixed while everything else was crashing in price during the period of deflation. Gold bugs make an argument for a deflation gold relationship by claiming that gold would have gone up during that period had it not been fixed, but the crashing dollar prices for all other things suggest that in a free market gold, too, would have fallen. It would have fallen, however, from a higher level given the inflation of 1914-1929 following the creation of the Fed. So gold became worth more in dollar terms than it was in 1913, which is why it began flowing out of the country. In 1934, the government finally recognized the new reality by raising gold's fixed price. Since 1970, markets have been in a large version of 1914-1930, except that gold has been allowed to float, so we can clearly see its inflation-related, pre-depression gains.

The research in Prechter's March 2008 Theorist (contact customer service for reprints) shows that even after Congress created the central bank, no one made money holding gold in a recession or depression for two generations (see data below).

In 1970, things changed dramatically. Investors lost interest in stocks and for a decade preferred to own gold instead. The same change occurred again in 2001. But, as we will see, recession had nothing to do with either of these periods of explosive price gain in precious metals.

To understand the deflation gold relationship, the time period one studies can make a huge difference. If we were to show the entire record from 1792, gold would show almost no movement on average during economic contractions or deflation. If we only showed 1969 to the present, it would show much more fluctuation. To give a balanced picture of the entire modern, wild-gold era, we compiled statistics that begin at the end of World War II. This is what most economists do, because they believe "modern finance" began at that time and that things have been "normal" since then. It's also when many data series begin. So our study fits the norm that most economists use. It also provides results entirely from the Fed era, making it relevant to current structural conditions.

To see if there really is a reliable deflation gold relationship, we created a table that shows the performance of gold during the 11 officially recognized recessions since 1945. One could make a case for different start times, so we took the 15th of the starting month and the 15th of the ending month as times to record the price of gold. The results speak for themselves.

Deflation Gold Relationship

For more on deflation, Download Robert Prechter's FREE 60-page eBook, The Guide to Understanding Deflation.

  Email |  Print
Bookmark and share It!
Deflation
Deflation Survival Guide
Deflation Topics
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Elliott Wave Principle is a detailed description of how financial markets behave. The description reveals that mass psychology swings from pessimism to optimism and back in a natural sequence, creating specific Elliott wave patterns in price movements. Each pattern has implications regarding the position of the market within its overall progression, past, present and future. The purpose of Elliott Wave International’s market-oriented publications is to outline the progress of markets in terms of the Wave Principle and to educate interested parties in the successful application of the Wave Principle. While a course of conduct regarding investments can be formulated from such application of the Wave Principle, at no time will Elliott Wave International make specific recommendations for any specific person, and at no time may a reader, caller or viewer be justified in inferring that any such advice is intended. Investing carries risk of losses, and trading futures or options is especially risky because these instruments are highly leveraged, and traders can lose more than their initial margin funds. Information provided by Elliott Wave International is expressed in good faith, but it is not guaranteed. The market service that never makes mistakes does not exist. Long-term success trading or investing in the markets demands recognition of the fact that error and uncertainty are part of any effort to assess future probabilities. Please ask your broker or your advisor to explain all risks to you before making any trading and investing decisions.